By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!Why, in IDE, does "::" look like a pair of italicized semicolons? That is, the two dots that comprise the symbol are not the same.
I don't really care if it's green and italicized, but couldn't it look like (um) a colon?
> ---Quote (Originally by vefatica)---
> Why, in IDE, does "::" look like a pair of italicized semicolons? That
> is, the two dots that comprise the symbol are not the same.
> I don't really care if it's green and italicized, but couldn't it look
> like (um) a colon?
> ---End Quote---
> It looks better with another font.
Why, in IDE, does "::" look like a pair of italicized semicolons? That is, the two dots that comprise the symbol are not the same. I don't really care if it's green and italicized, but couldn't it look like (um) a colon?
I know that. I was using Times New Roman, and with that font, an italicized colon looks like a semicolon.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----> ---Quote (Originally by vefatica)---
> Why, in IDE, does "::" look like a pair of italicized semicolons? That is, the two dots that comprise the symbol are not the same. I don't really care if it's green and italicized, but couldn't it look like (um) a colon?
> ---End Quote---
> Because comments in general are green and italicized, and many people use a double colon to introduce a comment.
>
>
>
>
>
If I remember correctly, a double colon :: introduces a regex in some contexts.
previous:tag = @eol, ' ', '\t'
previous:tag = @eol