Build notices

May 20, 2008
3,515
4
Elkridge, MD, USA
I never received build 47 upload notice.
The only upload messages I received this year in this NG were:

31 34 35 36 37 40 41 43 44 46

Will mail delivery of the NG ever be dependable?
--
Steve
 

rconn

Administrator
Staff member
May 14, 2008
12,316
148
I never received build 47 upload notice.
The only upload messages I received this year in this NG were:

31 34 35 36 37 40 41 43 44 46

Will mail delivery of the NG ever be dependable?
--
Steve

I looked at the mail server log and it says that you were sent the build 47 message. You might want to check your mail server and/or junk mail filters to see if they're deleting messages.
 
Jun 2, 2008
373
2
Newton, MA
I looked at the mail server log and it says that you were sent the build 47 message. You might want to check your mail server and/or junk mail filters to see if they're deleting messages.

I have also been getting fewer than half of the newsgroup traffic via email. It's so bad that I've been using the web interface, even though I find it a huge hassle compared to email delivery.

-- Jay
 
May 20, 2008
11,292
95
Syracuse, NY, USA
On Wed, 04 Feb 2009 12:28:21 -0600, Jay Sage <> wrote:


>---Quote (Originally by rconn)---
>I looked at the mail server log and it says that you were sent the build 47 message. You might want to check your mail server and/or junk mail filters to see if they're deleting messages.
>---End Quote---
>I have also been getting fewer than half of the newsgroup traffic via email. It's so bad that I've been using the web interface, even though I find it a huge hassle compared to email delivery.

I didn't get the build 47 announcement by email. And I agree with Jay. The web
interface is a hassle.
 
May 20, 2008
3,515
4
Elkridge, MD, USA
rconn wrote:
| ---Quote (Originally by Steve Fábián)---
| I never received build 47 upload notice.
| The only upload messages I received this year in this NG were:
|
| 31 34 35 36 37 40 41 43 44 46
|
| Will mail delivery of the NG ever be dependable?

Rex:

Your response failed to cut off my signature, which, as always, correctly
contained the signature separator line "-- ". In consequence all of your
response was cut off when I tried to reply. You wrote that your mail server

In any event, I accessed my raw mail on the Comcast server through
"webmail". Build 46 notice is there, but not the one for build 47. Note that
I keep all incoming mail on the server until I delete my local copy via the
Outlook Express' feature which in such event sends a "delete" message to the
server. I delete messages from JPsoft.com only when spam gets through your
firewall.

For future I just changed the mail server setting to preserve "spam" until I
explicitly delete it. I have no spam filter set locally in my mail client.
This will allow me to check back through the ever so slow webmail service
when I become aware of a missed build notice. Perhaps you could send me
private email just once, the next time you post a build notice, so I would
be aware of the need to look for it.
--
Steve
 
Similar threads
Thread starter Title Forum Replies Date
rconn News Take Command / TCC / CMDebug / TCC-RT v27.01 Build 22 Uploaded Support 0
rconn News Take Command / TCC / CMDebug / TCC-RT v26 Public Beta build 26.0.21 Support 0
rconn News Take Command / TCC / CMDebug / TCC-RT Public Beta Build 26.0.20 Support 0
Alpengreis How to? Where is a ChangeLog for v25 build 16 Support 4
rconn News Take Command / TCC / CMDebug / TCC-RT v25 Build 9 Support 0
rconn News Take Command / TCC / CMDebug / TCC-RT v25 Public Beta Build 8 Uploaded Support 9
Stefan Hassel Installation file TC 24.02 Build 47 is actually version 25.00.1 Support 10
C build 42 Support 1
R How to? Compare executables' version/build # including 123.456.789.01 Support 10
Peter Murschall IDE: RTL with non-English resources-problem is back in Build 28 Support 4
vefatica Another problem with build 22. Support 3
B Everything version in Take Command build 39? Support 3
vefatica WAD ANSI still misbehaves with build 35 Support 36
Y TCC on Win 1709 Build 17063.1000 Support 5
cxxl What's new in Build 51? Support 3
rconn News CMDebug Public Beta build 21.01.47 Support 0
samintz Build 38 Install issue Support 5
C Del /W999 2gbFile.ext / latest build / Win7 x64 / MSE / Everything Support 5
E Fixed View command broken in version 21.0 build 22 Support 9
vefatica Build 29, bad image Support 8
R Fixed set /r has stopped working in build 35 Support 4
vefatica Build 20 installer woes Support 14
rconn News Take Command V20 beta build 9 Support 0
C take command 19 not doing well under windows 10 build 14295 Support 3
Fross Build 46 Oddity Support 5
rconn News Take Command v19 public beta build 24 uploaded Support 0
rconn News Take Command v19 public beta build 23 Support 0
P Color directories in Win10 build 10586 console Support 11
vefatica Build 28 install Support 8
vefatica build 20 -> 22 Support 2
fishman@panix.com How do I get Build 20? Support 7
C What build is just released v18? Support 1
vefatica Build 14 install Support 3
vefatica Something is hosed in build 74 Support 10
rps Fixed Win "set /p" not working in V17 build 53 Support 3
vefatica Build 45 & 46 installer glitch Support 2
R Parser problems after build 44 Support 5
cgunhouse Jabber Command Line Option Being Transmitted -- Fixed with Build 42 Support 2
vefatica Both IFTP problems remain in build 50 Support 35
Dan Glynhampton TPIPE in Build 41 Support 4
C Build 34 install error Support 4
S Build 34 OK Support 5
S Documentation Webpage not showing latest V15 build Support 0
vefatica Build 55: ipworks9.dll missing Support 8
S 32b Build 54 does not match MD5 in tcmd.aiu Support 7
S Questions about new build announcements Support 0
B tpipe and MSVCR110.dll TCC x64 Build 44?? Support 19
Charles Dye Build 35 under XP Support 10
D ftps gives "Unable to build data connection" Support 5
vefatica Fixed Not fixed in build 55 Support 4

Similar threads