Firefox 29.0.1 - changing search engine

  • This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn more.
Jun 2, 2008
286
1
#3
Firefox is on a downward spiral just like Windows. I think you need to customize the interface, stick the search bar somewhere, use that to change search engines, and then remove it. Stupid, but true.
 
Jun 2, 2008
286
1
#7
Cannot verify this. Updated to 29.0.1 some seconds ago - no change. Also, I do not agree with TEA-Time, seeing the things Chrome does, there's no alternative to Firefox.
Don't get me wrong, I still primarily use Firefox, but they just revamped the interface and removed configurability in the name of adding configurability. At least I'm used to Chrome's (my 2nd browser of choice) programmers disappointing me.
 
May 30, 2008
210
1
#9
Don't get me wrong, I still primarily use Firefox, but they just revamped the interface and removed configurability in the name of adding configurability. At least I'm used to Chrome's (my 2nd browser of choice) programmers disappointing me.
The options they remove are mainly those that could be inadvertently changed by beginners and thus leave them stranded with a "broken" browser/web. For example, the Javascript checkbox in previous releases. As well as some toolbar buttons in this one apparently.

Power users can always resort to about:config or add-ons.
 
Jun 2, 2008
286
1
#10
Try convincing the 91% here (was 86% when I first saw it right after the change, so it's getting worse as it's forced down more people's throats) that it being dumbed down is for their own good:

https://input.mozilla.org/en-US/

I'm sorry, but removing the status/add-on bar, not allowing the address bar to be moved back above the tabs, taking away the regular and expanding spaces that could be placed on toolbars (so now everything is smashed to the left), and not allowing new toolbars to be created doesn't make it more configurable, and it doesn't keep people from breaking their browser either.
 
May 30, 2008
210
1
#11
I doubt those complaining are new users though. Any change is bound to upset some existing users.

Personally I like the new interface, but I never really customized the toolbars much either, I prefer to use the standard menu (and keyboard shortcuts), and it was improved in FF 29 (can now be displayed without disabling the new look).
 
#12
Removing options is ALWAYS BAD. It's the principle "We tell you what to do" instead of "Have your choice". Worse is when what is still adjustable is hidden how. Nickbackm, where is "About: config or add-ons"? I went through every entry in the "File Edit ..." bar and every item that has submenus, but not found. And looking at the original issue I posted, that little down-pointed triangle (to the right of the hieroglyphic (also known as icon) when hovering on it just tells you which search engine is currently chosen, no indication that clicking on the triangle opens a choice menu.

But we are ranting in the wrong venue. I did solve my original issue, and better than expected (search engine selection is sticky).
 
May 30, 2008
210
1
#13
> where is "About: config or add-ons"

You enter "about:config" in the location box to open a list of config attributes. Better not change anything unless you know what it does though!

Add-ons can be found from the Tools menu. Or Ctrl-Shift-A.
 
#16
> where is "About: config or add-ons"
You enter "about:config" in the location box to open a list of config attributes. Better not change anything unless you know what it does though!
How do I find that if I don't know in advance? And how do I guess that it is a virtual URL? But - as I wrote before - the rant belongs to a Firefox forum, not here.
 
Jun 2, 2008
286
1
#17
I doubt those complaining are new users though. Any change is bound to upset some existing users.

Personally I like the new interface, but I never really customized the toolbars much either, I prefer to use the standard menu (and keyboard shortcuts), and it was improved in FF 29 (can now be displayed without disabling the new look).
But the thing is.. they could have left those configurabilities (is that even a word?? heh) in and it wouldn't have taken away from the new interface at all.

Ok, I'm done. :)