Just a test

  • This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn more.
#3
On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 23:20:50 -0500, you wrote:


>---Quote---
>>emailed at 23:38:00
>---End Quote---
>Reply at 23:42:00.
The reply above took 38 minutes to appear on the web and be emailed. During
that time I navigated the forum site several times, both interactively and by
script.

Email notification works very poorly. Can you do something about that?

Emailed at 00:31:00.
 
#5
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 06:54:36 -0500, you wrote:


>---Quote---
>> The reply above took 38 minutes to appear on the web and be emailed. During
>> that time I navigated the forum site several times, both interactively
>> and by
>> script.
>>
>> Email notification works very poorly. Can you do something about that?
>---End Quote---
>No.
>
>Rex Conn
>JP Software
Have you reverted to processing mail at 10 minute intervals?

Can you say precisely what online activity it takes to get the mail to be
processed?
 

rconn

Administrator
Staff member
May 14, 2008
10,164
86
#6
vefatica wrote:

> On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 06:54:36 -0500, you wrote:
>
>
> Quote:
> >---Quote---
> >> The reply above took 38 minutes to appear on the web and be emailed.
> During
> >> that time I navigated the forum site several times, both interactively
> >> and by
> >> script.
> >>
> >> Email notification works very poorly. Can you do something about that?
> >---End Quote---
> >No.
> >
> >Rex Conn
> >JP Software
>
> Have you reverted to processing mail at 10 minute intervals?
No.


> Can you say precisely what online activity it takes to get the mail to be
> processed?
No -- it's not my code.

Rex Conn
JP Software
 
Jun 10, 2008
35
0
#7
vefatica <> wrote:

> ---Quote---
> >---Quote---
> >> The reply above took 38 minutes to appear on the web and be emailed. During
> >> that time I navigated the forum site several times, both interactively
> >> and by
> >> script.
> >>
> >> Email notification works very poorly. Can you do something about that?
> >---End Quote---
> >No.
> >
> >Rex Conn
> >JP Software
> ---End Quote---
> Have you reverted to processing mail at 10 minute intervals?
If only it were 10 minutes;-). Some mails I've sent during the last few
days took hours. I don't mind a few minutes or even the odd half hour
but such delays are bordering on the ridiculous.

It seems the old nntp-based access was a helluva headache for JPSoft...
but this new forum stuff is not entirely satisfying either. Well, my 2c.


> Can you say precisely what online activity it takes to get the mail to be
> processed?
Send and pray?

--
cheers thomasl

web: http://thomaslauer.com/start
 
Jun 10, 2008
35
0
#8
vefatica <> wrote:

> ---Quote---
> >---Quote---
> >> The reply above took 38 minutes to appear on the web and be emailed. During
> >> that time I navigated the forum site several times, both interactively
> >> and by
> >> script.
> >>
> >> Email notification works very poorly. Can you do something about that?
> >---End Quote---
> >No.
> >
> >Rex Conn
> >JP Software
> ---End Quote---
> Have you reverted to processing mail at 10 minute intervals?
If only it were 10 minutes;-). Some mails I've sent during the last few
days took hours. I don't mind a few minutes or even the odd half hour
but such delays are bordering on the ridiculous.

It seems the old nntp-based access was a helluva headache for JPSoft...
but this new forum stuff is not entirely satisfying either. Well, my 2c.


> Can you say precisely what online activity it takes to get the mail to be
> processed?
Send and pray?

--
cheers thomasl

web: http://thomaslauer.com/start
 
#9
thomasl wrote:
| If only it were 10 minutes;-). Some mails I've sent during the last
| few days took hours. I don't mind a few minutes or even the odd half
| hour but such delays are bordering on the ridiculous.
|
| It seems the old nntp-based access was a helluva headache for
| JPSoft... but this new forum stuff is not entirely satisfying either.
| Well, my 2c.

Agree!
--
Steve