newest files in a tree
- Thread starter Roedy
- Start date
samintz
Scott Mintz
- May
- 1,580
- 28
The first should be doable using date ranges.
The switch /[d0] will only select files matching today's date for example.
The second is doable using PDIR.
pdir /s /(dm/d/y fpn)
-Scott
Has anyone already written a script for
finding the n more recently modified files in a directory tree, ideally
limited by a wildcard?
Also, how about something like dir /bs that includes just the file name
and date
The switch /[d0] will only select files matching today's date for example.
The second is doable using PDIR.
pdir /s /(dm/d/y fpn)
-Scott
Has anyone already written a script for
finding the n more recently modified files in a directory tree, ideally
limited by a wildcard?
Also, how about something like dir /bs that includes just the file name
and date
Charles Dye
Super Moderator
- May
- 4,848
- 117
Staff member
Sounds like a good candidate for plugin commands or functions, perhaps returning results in an array variable. Vincent's 4UTILS has @OLDEST and @NEWEST; I don't know whether they can recurse into subdirectories (the docs are a bit laconic.)
- May
- 382
- 2
You could also use Jim Cook's timedir.exe. To find the 3 most recent .txt files in a tree starting at c:\folder:
Note that the seemingly equivalent TCMD version:
does not yield the three most recent files in the tree, but the three most recent files in the first listed folder.
TIMEDIR first creates the whole output list, then it sorts it.
To include just the file name and modification date/time:
Code:
TIMEDIR /A-d /S /F /O:-d /^>3 c:\folder\*.txt
Code:
DIR /A-d /S /F /O:-d c:\folder\*.txt | HEAD /N3TIMEDIR first creates the whole output list, then it sorts it.
To include just the file name and modification date/time:
Code:
TIMEDIR /S /F /(F TMW/TDW/TYW TTW)The following BTM can be modified to return more than the most recent one
:: Determine latest file is folder tree and display
::
:: =======================================================================================================================*setlocal
*unalias *
unset /q f t
set d=%@if[%# eq 0,%_cwd,%1]
pushd %@full[%d]
pushd %d
set t=0
global /i /q (
set i="%@execstr[dir /a: /b /f /k /m /o:-d]"
echo %@if[isdir[%i],D,F] %i
set x=%@fileage[%i]
if %x gt %t (
set t=%x
set f=%i
)
)
pause
cls
echo %=nTree scanned: %@full[%d]
echo %=n Latest File:
echo File Path: %@path[%f]
echo File Name: %@filename[%f]
echo File Size: %@comma[%@filesize[%f]]
echo Date / Time: %@filedate[%f] %@filetime[%f]
popd
popd
----- Original Message -----
From: Roedy
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 01:05 PM
Subject: [T&T - Scripting-t-3290] newest files in a tree
Has anyone already written a script for finding the n more recently modified files in a directory tree, ideally limited by a wildcard?
Also, how about something like dir /bs that includes just the file name and date
:: Determine latest file is folder tree and display
::
:: =======================================================================================================================*setlocal
*unalias *
unset /q f t
set d=%@if[%# eq 0,%_cwd,%1]
pushd %@full[%d]
pushd %d
set t=0
global /i /q (
set i="%@execstr[dir /a: /b /f /k /m /o:-d]"
echo %@if[isdir[%i],D,F] %i
set x=%@fileage[%i]
if %x gt %t (
set t=%x
set f=%i
)
)
pause
cls
echo %=nTree scanned: %@full[%d]
echo %=n Latest File:
echo File Path: %@path[%f]
echo File Name: %@filename[%f]
echo File Size: %@comma[%@filesize[%f]]
echo Date / Time: %@filedate[%f] %@filetime[%f]
popd
popd
----- Original Message -----
From: Roedy
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 01:05 PM
Subject: [T&T - Scripting-t-3290] newest files in a tree
Has anyone already written a script for finding the n more recently modified files in a directory tree, ideally limited by a wildcard?
Also, how about something like dir /bs that includes just the file name and date
- Aug
- 294
- 1
: Has anyone already written a script for finding the n more recently modified files in a
directory tree,
: ideally limited by a wildcard?
:
: Also, how about something like dir /bs that includes just the file name and date
This example exists in V8 help file .. %@execstr[*dir /a:-d /h /o:-t /f ] alias it LF
bingo
directory tree,
: ideally limited by a wildcard?
:
: Also, how about something like dir /bs that includes just the file name and date
This example exists in V8 help file .. %@execstr[*dir /a:-d /h /o:-t /f ] alias it LF
bingo
- May
- 3,515
- 4
Kachupp wrote:
|| Has anyone already written a script for finding the n more recently
|| modified files in a directory tree, ideally limited by a wildcard?
|
| This example exists in V8 help file .. %@execstr[*dir /a:-d /h /o:-t
| /f ] alias it LF bingo
That gives only ONE file, the OP requested a variable number "n". I'd
recommend TIMEDIR instead of a batch file.
--
Steve
|| Has anyone already written a script for finding the n more recently
|| modified files in a directory tree, ideally limited by a wildcard?
|
| This example exists in V8 help file .. %@execstr[*dir /a:-d /h /o:-t
| /f ] alias it LF bingo
That gives only ONE file, the OP requested a variable number "n". I'd
recommend TIMEDIR instead of a batch file.
--
Steve
Charles Dye
Super Moderator
- May
- 4,848
- 117
Staff member
TIMEDIR does look like the most elegant approach proposed thus far.
samintz
Scott Mintz
- May
- 1,580
- 28
If I want to find the 10 newest files in
a directory I would use DIR piped into HEAD or TAIL.
dir /a:-d /od /km |! tail /N10
or
dir /a:-d /o-d /km |! head /N10
alias newest=`dir /a:-d /od /km %2$
|! tail /N%@if[%1.==.,10,%1]`
newest
newest 10 *.bat
newest 5 *.bat;*.btm
-Scott
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve
Fabian
That gives only ONE file, the OP requested
a variable number "n". I'd recommend TIMEDIR instead of a batch
file.
TIMEDIR does look like the most elegant
approach proposed thus far.
a directory I would use DIR piped into HEAD or TAIL.
dir /a:-d /od /km |! tail /N10
or
dir /a:-d /o-d /km |! head /N10
alias newest=`dir /a:-d /od /km %2$
|! tail /N%@if[%1.==.,10,%1]`
newest
newest 10 *.bat
newest 5 *.bat;*.btm
-Scott
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve
Fabian
That gives only ONE file, the OP requested
a variable number "n". I'd recommend TIMEDIR instead of a batch
file.
TIMEDIR does look like the most elegant
approach proposed thus far.
Charles Dye
Super Moderator
- May
- 4,848
- 117
Staff member
That'll give the n most recent in a single directory....
This is one of the things I was hoping to solve with the "DIR /S sorted
together" request.
If I had been more clear that I wanted the full DIR output with whatever
switches applied, this would have been solved by DIR in the latest TCC.
I (obviously) use TIMEDIR to solve this issue as well.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 15:45, Charles Dye <>wrote:
--
Jim Cook
2011 Monday: 4/4, 6/6, 8/8, 10/10, 12/12 and 5/9, 9/5, 7/11, 11/7.
Next year they're Tuesday.
together" request.
If I had been more clear that I wanted the full DIR output with whatever
switches applied, this would have been solved by DIR in the latest TCC.
I (obviously) use TIMEDIR to solve this issue as well.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 15:45, Charles Dye <>wrote:
--
Jim Cook
2011 Monday: 4/4, 6/6, 8/8, 10/10, 12/12 and 5/9, 9/5, 7/11, 11/7.
Next year they're Tuesday.
samintz
Scott Mintz
- May
- 1,580
- 28
This is a TCC solution that doesn't rely
on an external plugin or app.
pdir /a:-d /s /(dy/m/d th:m z
fpn) |! sort |! tail /N10
or
pdir /a:-d /s /(dy/m/d th:m z
fpn) |! sort /r |! head /N10
alias newest=`pdir /a:-d /(dy/m/d th:m
z fpn) %2$ |! sort |! tail /N%@if[%1.==.,10,%1]`
newest
newest 5
newest 10 /s
newest 10 *.cpp /s
-Scott
This is one of the things I was hoping
to solve with the "DIR /S sorted
together" request.
If I had been more clear that I wanted the full DIR output with whatever
switches applied, this would have been solved by DIR in the latest TCC.
I (obviously) use TIMEDIR to solve this issue as well.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 15:45, Charles Dye <>wrote:
Quote:
--
Jim Cook
2011 Monday: 4/4, 6/6, 8/8, 10/10, 12/12 and 5/9, 9/5, 7/11, 11/7.
Next year they're Tuesday.
on an external plugin or app.
pdir /a:-d /s /(dy/m/d th:m z
fpn) |! sort |! tail /N10
or
pdir /a:-d /s /(dy/m/d th:m z
fpn) |! sort /r |! head /N10
alias newest=`pdir /a:-d /(dy/m/d th:m
z fpn) %2$ |! sort |! tail /N%@if[%1.==.,10,%1]`
newest
newest 5
newest 10 /s
newest 10 *.cpp /s
-Scott
This is one of the things I was hoping
to solve with the "DIR /S sorted
together" request.
If I had been more clear that I wanted the full DIR output with whatever
switches applied, this would have been solved by DIR in the latest TCC.
I (obviously) use TIMEDIR to solve this issue as well.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 15:45, Charles Dye <>wrote:
Quote:
samintz)---
--
Jim Cook
2011 Monday: 4/4, 6/6, 8/8, 10/10, 12/12 and 5/9, 9/5, 7/11, 11/7.
Next year they're Tuesday.
Scott,
Why does your lines wrap so early? Are you posting thru the website or what email client?
----- Original Message -----
From: samintz
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 09:06 PM
Subject: RE: [T&T - Scripting-t-3290] Re: newest files in a tree
This is a TCC solution that doesn't rely
on an external plugin or app.
pdir /a:-d /s /(dy/m/d th:m z
fpn) |! sort |! tail /N10
or
pdir /a:-d /s /(dy/m/d th:m z
fpn) |! sort /r |! head /N10
alias newest=`pdir /a:-d /(dy/m/d th:m
z fpn) %2$ |! sort |! tail /N%@if[%1.==.,10,%1]`
newest
newest 5
newest 10 /s
newest 10 *.cpp /s
-Scott
This is one of the things I was hoping
to solve with the "DIR /S sorted
together" request.
If I had been more clear that I wanted the full DIR output with whatever
switches applied, this would have been solved by DIR in the latest TCC.
I (obviously) use TIMEDIR to solve this issue as well.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 15:45, Charles Dye <>wrote:
Quote:
Quote:
> ---Quote (Originally by
samintz)---
Quote:
> If I want to find the 10 newest files in
> a directory I would use DIR piped into HEAD or TAIL.
> ---End Quote---
> That'll give the n most recent in a single directory....
>
>
>
>
>
--
Jim Cook
2011 Monday: 4/4, 6/6, 8/8, 10/10, 12/12 and 5/9, 9/5, 7/11, 11/7.
Next year they're Tuesday.
Why does your lines wrap so early? Are you posting thru the website or what email client?
----- Original Message -----
From: samintz
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 09:06 PM
Subject: RE: [T&T - Scripting-t-3290] Re: newest files in a tree
This is a TCC solution that doesn't rely
on an external plugin or app.
pdir /a:-d /s /(dy/m/d th:m z
fpn) |! sort |! tail /N10
or
pdir /a:-d /s /(dy/m/d th:m z
fpn) |! sort /r |! head /N10
alias newest=`pdir /a:-d /(dy/m/d th:m
z fpn) %2$ |! sort |! tail /N%@if[%1.==.,10,%1]`
newest
newest 5
newest 10 /s
newest 10 *.cpp /s
-Scott
This is one of the things I was hoping
to solve with the "DIR /S sorted
together" request.
If I had been more clear that I wanted the full DIR output with whatever
switches applied, this would have been solved by DIR in the latest TCC.
I (obviously) use TIMEDIR to solve this issue as well.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 15:45, Charles Dye <>wrote:
Quote:
Quote:
> ---Quote (Originally by
samintz)---
Quote:
> If I want to find the 10 newest files in
> a directory I would use DIR piped into HEAD or TAIL.
> ---End Quote---
> That'll give the n most recent in a single directory....
>
>
>
>
>
--
Jim Cook
2011 Monday: 4/4, 6/6, 8/8, 10/10, 12/12 and 5/9, 9/5, 7/11, 11/7.
Next year they're Tuesday.
samintz
Scott Mintz
- May
- 1,580
- 28
Lotus frickin' Notes.
-Scott
Scott,
Why does your lines wrap so early? Are you posting thru the website or
what email client?
----- Original Message -----
From: samintz
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 09:06 PM
Subject: RE: [T&T - Scripting-t-3290] Re: newest files in a tree
This is a TCC solution that doesn't rely
on an external plugin or app.
pdir /a:-d /s /(dy/m/d th:m z
fpn) |! sort |! tail /N10
or
pdir /a:-d /s /(dy/m/d th:m z
fpn) |! sort /r |! head /N10
alias newest=`pdir /a:-d /(dy/m/d th:m
z fpn) %2$ |! sort |! tail /N%@if[%1.==.,10,%1]`
newest
newest 5
newest 10 /s
newest 10 *.cpp /s
-Scott
This is one of the things I was hoping
to solve with the "DIR /S sorted
together" request.
If I had been more clear that I wanted the full DIR output with whatever
switches applied, this would have been solved by DIR in the latest TCC.
I (obviously) use TIMEDIR to solve this issue as well.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 15:45, Charles Dye <>wrote:
Quote:
Quote:
samintz)---
Quote:
--
Jim Cook
2011 Monday: 4/4, 6/6, 8/8, 10/10, 12/12 and 5/9, 9/5, 7/11, 11/7.
Next year they're Tuesday.
-Scott
Scott,
Why does your lines wrap so early? Are you posting thru the website or
what email client?
----- Original Message -----
From: samintz
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 09:06 PM
Subject: RE: [T&T - Scripting-t-3290] Re: newest files in a tree
This is a TCC solution that doesn't rely
on an external plugin or app.
pdir /a:-d /s /(dy/m/d th:m z
fpn) |! sort |! tail /N10
or
pdir /a:-d /s /(dy/m/d th:m z
fpn) |! sort /r |! head /N10
alias newest=`pdir /a:-d /(dy/m/d th:m
z fpn) %2$ |! sort |! tail /N%@if[%1.==.,10,%1]`
newest
newest 5
newest 10 /s
newest 10 *.cpp /s
-Scott
This is one of the things I was hoping
to solve with the "DIR /S sorted
together" request.
If I had been more clear that I wanted the full DIR output with whatever
switches applied, this would have been solved by DIR in the latest TCC.
I (obviously) use TIMEDIR to solve this issue as well.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 15:45, Charles Dye <>wrote:
Quote:
Quote:
samintz)---
Quote:
--
Jim Cook
2011 Monday: 4/4, 6/6, 8/8, 10/10, 12/12 and 5/9, 9/5, 7/11, 11/7.
Next year they're Tuesday.
Charles Dye
Super Moderator
- May
- 4,848
- 117
Staff member
You can't use WordStar as your editor? Or SpeedScript, or whatever?
samintz
Scott Mintz
- May
- 1,580
- 28
It appears to wrap after I hit send. It
certainly isn't wrapped as I write it. And it's odd because some
things wrap and some things don't. I haven't quite figured that out
yet.
-Scott
Quote:
Originally Posted by samintz
Lotus frickin' Notes.
You can't use WordStar as your editor?
Or SpeedScript, or whatever?
certainly isn't wrapped as I write it. And it's odd because some
things wrap and some things don't. I haven't quite figured that out
yet.
-Scott
Quote:
Originally Posted by samintz
Lotus frickin' Notes.
You can't use WordStar as your editor?
Or SpeedScript, or whatever?
- Jul
- 177
- 1
What is your outgoing mail format set to?? I suspect that MIME would work better than Rich Text (this can be set on the location document's Mail tab). There is also a user preference setting that allows you to control whether Internet messages are sent as plain text, HTML or both although exactly where that is depends on which version of Notes you are using.
- Aug
- 258
- 4
Hi,
we surely all know, that 4dos/4nt/tcc is the real, one and only religion ;-)
But beside of that I often use "logparser" from M$.
It can parse a lot of file types, even the windows registry or the filesystem by using a sql-like syntax.
e.g.
we surely all know, that 4dos/4nt/tcc is the real, one and only religion ;-)
But beside of that I often use "logparser" from M$.
It can parse a lot of file types, even the windows registry or the filesystem by using a sql-like syntax.
e.g.
Code:
logparser -i:fs -rtp:-1 -q:on -recurse:-1 "
select top 10 to_string( LastWriteTime, 'yyyy-MM-dd hh:mm:ss') as lwt,
path, name, attributes from 'd:\temp\*.*'
where substr(attributes,0,1) <> 'D' order by lwt desc "
2106-01-01 06:14:18 D:\temp\alter_pc\dosbox\games\prehistorik2\MYSTERY.TRK MYSTERY.TRK -A-------
2023-09-13 01:44:46 D:\temp\alter_pc\dosbox\games\prehistorik2\PRESENTA.TRK PRESENTA.TRK -A-------
2023-09-13 00:27:14 D:\temp\alter_pc\dosbox\games\prehistorik2\GLACE.TRK GLACE.TRK -A-------
2023-09-13 00:20:30 D:\temp\alter_pc\dosbox\games\prehistorik2\MINES.TRK MINES.TRK -A-------
2011-10-24 22:18:30 D:\temp\etilqs_u7QuCRx80iuEtBJlbSiC etilqs_u7QuCRx80iuEtBJlbSiC -A-H-----
2011-10-24 22:18:03 D:\temp\~DF2B334647DD15BC79.TMP ~DF2B334647DD15BC79.TMP -A-------
2011-10-24 22:18:03 D:\temp\~DF1ACDBCF7BC07A04D.TMP ~DF1ACDBCF7BC07A04D.TMP -A-------
2011-10-24 22:09:11 D:\temp\etilqs_c4qTaCzJYCb4YIeS7L7v etilqs_c4qTaCzJYCb4YIeS7L7v -A-H-----
2011-10-24 22:04:39 D:\temp\etilqs_iAtNyyYvTRbxJosTI2he etilqs_iAtNyyYvTRbxJosTI2he -A-H-----
2011-10-24 20:19:05 D:\temp\etilqs_cmyqv3flU1hgsynka8P6 etilqs_cmyqv3flU1hgsynka8P6 -A-H-----Charles Dye
Super Moderator
- May
- 4,848
- 117
Staff member
- May
- 3,515
- 4
From: Charles Dye
| And here 'tis: Sift Plugin
It is highly usable as is, thanks, but for just finding the timestamp of the latest file in a directory tree it requires a very complex command line, and the result needs lot of work to be usable. Here are my
SUGGESTIONS:
- should post in TC_PLUGINS!
- should use /S for including subdirectories; possibly incorporating the /S+ etc. syntax (lots of work... unless you can get Rex to provide access to his code)
- should use /T: for type of timestamp, to match TCC
- should be able to combine multiple options with a single /, e.g., /ins instead of /i /n /a
- should make file specification last element on command line, so multiple specifications could be accommodated (see also suggestion about keyword vs. positional parameters)
- should make a single file the default
- with file specification last, absent specification should default to ALL as in DIR
- sometimes (esp. when copying files newer than the last download, e.g., from an ftp site) I want only the timestamp of the latest file in a (local) directory[tree], in a format suitable for a file selection (or exclusion) range, e.g.:
/![d%_sift_timestamp]
- along with that, maybe a whole set of internal variables, e.g., _sift_dirs, _sift_files, _sift_errors; also the information on the extreme entry found: _sift_file, _sift_size, _sift_time - these would be the same values returned in the array when just one result is asked for.
- if the found entry's information is made available through variables, the array itself should be optional
- any non-mandatory parameters should not be "positional" ones, they should be "keyword" parameters, i.e, specified using an option flag, with optional space between the flag and the parameter value
--
HTH, Steve
It
| And here 'tis: Sift Plugin
It is highly usable as is, thanks, but for just finding the timestamp of the latest file in a directory tree it requires a very complex command line, and the result needs lot of work to be usable. Here are my
SUGGESTIONS:
- should post in TC_PLUGINS!
- should use /S for including subdirectories; possibly incorporating the /S+ etc. syntax (lots of work... unless you can get Rex to provide access to his code)
- should use /T: for type of timestamp, to match TCC
- should be able to combine multiple options with a single /, e.g., /ins instead of /i /n /a
- should make file specification last element on command line, so multiple specifications could be accommodated (see also suggestion about keyword vs. positional parameters)
- should make a single file the default
- with file specification last, absent specification should default to ALL as in DIR
- sometimes (esp. when copying files newer than the last download, e.g., from an ftp site) I want only the timestamp of the latest file in a (local) directory[tree], in a format suitable for a file selection (or exclusion) range, e.g.:
/![d%_sift_timestamp]
- along with that, maybe a whole set of internal variables, e.g., _sift_dirs, _sift_files, _sift_errors; also the information on the extreme entry found: _sift_file, _sift_size, _sift_time - these would be the same values returned in the array when just one result is asked for.
- if the found entry's information is made available through variables, the array itself should be optional
- any non-mandatory parameters should not be "positional" ones, they should be "keyword" parameters, i.e, specified using an option flag, with optional space between the flag and the parameter value
--
HTH, Steve
It
Charles Dye
Super Moderator
- May
- 4,848
- 117
Staff member
/R for recursion was a deliberate choice, since I'm using /S for Smallest. (Think of it is FOR compatibility....) As for the /S+ syntax, it's all very cool but I don't think I've ever had a need for it.
Never liked such syntax; it causes problems if you have multiletter options (and there's already one in there.) I could easily allow you to mash options together without spaces, but you'd have to provide the slash before each one.
Or perhaps allow args in any order, but require a double percent sign before the array name?
- May
- 3,515
- 4
From: Charles Dye
| Originally Posted by Steve Fabian
| - should use /S for including subdirectories; possibly incorporating
| the /S+ etc. syntax (lots of work... unless you can get Rex to
| provide access to his code)
|
| /R for recursion was a deliberate choice, since I'm using /S for
| Smallest. (Think of it is FOR compatibility....) As for the /S+
| syntax, it's all very cool but I don't think I've ever had a need for
| it.
We can learn to like it...
| Quote:
| - should be able to combine multiple options with a single /, e.g.,
| /ins instead of /i /n /a
|
| Never liked such syntax; it causes problems if you have multiletter
| options (and there's already one in there.) I could easily allow you
| to mash options together without spaces, but you'd have to provide
| the slash before each one.
Actually it already works without space before /!
| Quote:
| - should make file specification last element on command line, so
| multiple specifications could be accommodated (see also suggestion
| about keyword vs. positional parameters)
|
| Or perhaps allow args in any order, but require a double percent sign
| before the array name?
Or make SIFT the default array name. No "%%" - it gets mangled too often! I prefer the keyword-parameter approach...
--
Steve
| Originally Posted by Steve Fabian
| - should use /S for including subdirectories; possibly incorporating
| the /S+ etc. syntax (lots of work... unless you can get Rex to
| provide access to his code)
|
| /R for recursion was a deliberate choice, since I'm using /S for
| Smallest. (Think of it is FOR compatibility....) As for the /S+
| syntax, it's all very cool but I don't think I've ever had a need for
| it.
We can learn to like it...
| Quote:
| - should be able to combine multiple options with a single /, e.g.,
| /ins instead of /i /n /a
|
| Never liked such syntax; it causes problems if you have multiletter
| options (and there's already one in there.) I could easily allow you
| to mash options together without spaces, but you'd have to provide
| the slash before each one.
Actually it already works without space before /!
| Quote:
| - should make file specification last element on command line, so
| multiple specifications could be accommodated (see also suggestion
| about keyword vs. positional parameters)
|
| Or perhaps allow args in any order, but require a double percent sign
| before the array name?
Or make SIFT the default array name. No "%%" - it gets mangled too often! I prefer the keyword-parameter approach...
--
Steve
Charles Dye
Super Moderator
- May
- 4,848
- 117
Staff member
On second thought, rather than multiple arguments, wouldn't it make more sense just to (correctly) support include lists?
- May
- 3,515
- 4
From: Charles Dye
| On second thought, rather than multiple arguments, wouldn't it make
| more sense just to (correctly) support include lists?
Only if you support multiple include lists! A very likely scenario for using SIFT has two or more base directories. Only the first element of an include list may contain a path.
--
Steve
| On second thought, rather than multiple arguments, wouldn't it make
| more sense just to (correctly) support include lists?
Only if you support multiple include lists! A very likely scenario for using SIFT has two or more base directories. Only the first element of an include list may contain a path.
--
Steve
Charles Dye
Super Moderator
- May
- 4,848
- 117
Staff member
I'm putting up a radically rewritten build, which not only addresses some of Steve's suggestions, but also seriously speeds up the process for very large arrays. Please beat on it!
- Jan
- 615
- 15
Currently the download v0.30.0 is still posted, not the documented v0.50.0. Or do I need to purge my browser cache?
Charles Dye
Super Moderator
- May
- 4,848
- 117
Staff member
It's definitely 0.50. A forced refresh ought to do it; or purge the cache if that doesn't work.
Charles,
Is that the browser cache or the DNS cache? I have no problems with geting the current broswer pages but just asking for possible futire reference.
----- Original Message -----
From: Charles Dye
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 12:36 PM
Subject: RE: [T&T - Scripting-t-3290] Re: newest files in a tree
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnQSmith
Currently the download v0.30.0 is still posted, not the documented v0.50.0. Or do I need to purge my browser cache?
It's definitely 0.50. A forced refresh ought to do it; or purge the cache if that doesn't work.
Is that the browser cache or the DNS cache? I have no problems with geting the current broswer pages but just asking for possible futire reference.
----- Original Message -----
From: Charles Dye
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2011 12:36 PM
Subject: RE: [T&T - Scripting-t-3290] Re: newest files in a tree
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnQSmith
Currently the download v0.30.0 is still posted, not the documented v0.50.0. Or do I need to purge my browser cache?
It's definitely 0.50. A forced refresh ought to do it; or purge the cache if that doesn't work.
Charles Dye
Super Moderator
- May
- 4,848
- 117
Staff member
I meant the browser cache.
- Jan
- 615
- 15
I reset/deleted the browser cache and still got the old file. Apparently it was the cache on our proxy server. I was able to download it using my iPhone and then email to myself.
