vefatica wrote:
| ---Quote (Originally by vefatica)---
|| I expected TCC to handle this easily. But ...
||
||
|| Code:
|| ---------
|| v:\> set z=2
||
|| v:\> for /l %i in (1,1,%@eval[(%z + 4) / 2]) echo %i
|| TCC: Syntax error "@eval[(%z + 4"
|| ---------
| ---End Quote---
Verified here in all versions going back to 6.01.245U. I suspect the parser
looks at the brackets surrounding the function parameters as a
character-selection wildcard, in which role it is, of course, wrong.
| Why didn't I get that post in the mail?
I did not get it, either! So many of my emailed posts to
tc_suggestion
[email protected] were never returned that I started sending them to
this NG (which may be useless to do, as Rex reported that he ignores this NG
when looking for suggestions). I think there is a serious flaw in at least
one of the mechanisms which post email messages into the browsable database,
and which email new posts. Another issue is that for those of us whose
registered name in the browser is not representable in ASCII (e.g. Péter
Köves), the non-ASCII letters are just snuffed out by the "remailer", and
e.g. my name shows up as Fbin. I am CC*ing myself on this message, to see
whether or not this last issue is due to how Outlook Express handles my
incoming mail.
--
Steve Fábián