Take Command v11 Public Beta Build 26 Uploaded

May 29, 2008
565
4
Groton, CT
I've uploaded build 26 to the ftp and http (updater) sites.

This includes fixes for all of the known/reproducible problems (except Tk) as well as a final draft of the help file.

This build triggered several AVG warnings and I gave up trying to list temporary installation directories in AVG's exception list. I was able to install this build, though, by opening the installation kit with 7-Zip and extracting the files dated 26-Oct-09 directly into the directory where build 25 was previously installed (and overwriting the files there).

None of the files I actually extracted triggered any AVG warnings.
 

rconn

Administrator
Staff member
May 14, 2008
12,312
147
This build triggered several AVG warnings and I gave up trying to list temporary installation directories in AVG's exception list. I was able to install this build, though, by opening the installation kit with 7-Zip and extracting the files dated 26-Oct-09 directly into the directory where build 25 was previously installed (and overwriting the files there).

None of the files I actually extracted triggered any AVG warnings.

At this point, I cannot understand why ANYONE would continue to use AVG, which generates more false positives than any other ten antivirus apps combined.
 
May 29, 2008
565
4
Groton, CT
At this point, I cannot understand why ANYONE would continue to use AVG, which generates more false positives than any other ten antivirus apps combined.

Well, I was just trying to post possibly useful information about how to get around the inconvenience for any other AVG users out there, but since you implied a question, I'll answer it.

I continue to use AVG because since I've started, I've gotten ZERO real viri on my computer, but it has detected many. Perhaps some of the ones it's detected have been false positives. Maybe, but most of them are in junk email, so as far as I'm concerned, AVG is doing a hell of a good job for me.

TCMD components are the only false positives it has detected that I'm sure of. I'm willing to put up with the false positive virus indications because I like both products: Take Command and AVG.
 

dim

Dimitry Andric
May 31, 2008
205
1
Netherlands
On 2009-10-16 16:45, dcantor wrote:

> This build triggered several AVG warnings and I gave up trying to list temporary installation directories in AVG's exception list. I was able to install this build, though, by opening the installation kit with 7-Zip and extracting the files dated 26-Oct-09 directly into the directory where build 25 was previously installed (and overwriting the files there).

I have tested this in a VM with the latest version of AVG (the free
edition, version 9.0.686), and it indeed triggers on the tcmd.exe file
during the installation. It thinks it has the Win32/Virut virus.

I have used AVG's "upload to AVG labs" feature to report it as a false
positive. No idea if they actually look at those... :)

In any case, AVG is (again?) the only scanner to trigger on this:

https://www.virustotal.com/analisis/97bd0f7676f1fa7f2985875b324fc4297f19609b50f4c3df0b5de0a7afb3500e-1255718487
 

dim

Dimitry Andric
May 31, 2008
205
1
Netherlands
On 2009-10-16 20:49, dim wrote:

> I have used AVG's "upload to AVG labs" feature to report it as a false
> positive. No idea if they actually look at those... :)

Just received this from them... I hope it'll be fixed in their next datafiles update.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: VVSAMPLE analysis
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:10:30 +0200 (CEST)
From: AVG Technical Support <support@avg.com>
To: dimitry@andric.com

This e-mail is an auto-response message. Please do not reply.

AVG Research Lab has analyzed the file(s) you have sent from your AVG Virus Vault. Below you can find the results for each file. The final verdict on the file is either a correct detection or a false positive detection.

Further information about the verdicts are available at our website:
http://www.avg.com/faq-1184

"C:\Documents and Settings\Dim\Application Data\JP Software\Take Command 11.0\install\CB8344E\tcmd.exe" - false alarm



Best regards,

AVG Customer Services
AVG Technologies
website: http://www.avg.com
 
May 20, 2008
3,515
4
Elkridge, MD, USA
dcantor wrote:
|| ---Quote (Originally by rconn)---
|| At this point, I cannot understand why ANYONE would continue to use
|| AVG, which generates more false positives than any other ten
|| antivirus apps combined. ---End Quote---
|| Well, I was just trying to post possibly useful information about
|| how to get around the inconvenience for any other AVG users out
|| there, but since you implied a question, I'll answer it.
||
|| I continue to use AVG because since I've started, I've gotten ZERO
|| real viri on my computer, but it has detected many. Perhaps some
|| of the ones it's detected have been false positives. Maybe, but
|| most of them are in junk email, so as far as I'm concerned, AVG is
|| doing a hell of a good job for me.
||
|| TCMD components are the only false positives it has detected that
|| I'm sure of. I'm willing to put up with the false positive virus
|| indications because I like both products: Take Command and AVG.

I found some false positives in old PC-DOS programs which are archived on my
system. TCSTUB.EXE of V7 is the only JP Software one currently reported. My
reason for keeping it is that it is much faster than McAfee (which I can get
free from comcast) or Symantec (bundled on hardware) and the price is right.
--
Steve
 
C

CSGalloway@nc.rr.com

Guest
It doesn't say if it was a correct detection or a false positive. Be nice if they would include that - wouldn't it.
----- Original Message -----
From: dim
To: CSGalloway@nc.rr.com
Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 09:47 PM
Subject: RE: [Support-t-1463] Re: Take Command v11 Public Beta Build 26 Uploaded


On 2009-10-16 20:49, dim wrote:

Just received this from them... I hope it'll be fixed in their next datafiles update.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: VVSAMPLE analysis
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:10:30 +0200 (CEST)
From: AVG Technical Support
To: dimitry@andric.com

This e-mail is an auto-response message. Please do not reply.

AVG Research Lab has analyzed the file(s) you have sent from your AVG Virus Vault. Below you can find the results for each file. The final verdict on the file is either a correct detection or a false positive detection.

Further information about the verdicts are available at our website:
http://www.avg.com/faq-1184

"C:\Documents and Settings\Dim\Application Data\JP Software\Take Command 11.0\install\CB8344E\tcmd.exe" - false alarm



Best regards,

AVG Customer Services
AVG Technologies
website: http://www.avg.com
 
May 20, 2008
11,285
95
Syracuse, NY, USA
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:16:29 -0500, "CSGalloway@nc.rr.com"
<> wrote:

|It doesn't say if it was a correct detection or a false positive. Be nice if they would include that - wouldn't it.

Didn't it say "false alarm"?
--
- Vince
 
Similar threads
Thread starter Title Forum Replies Date
rconn Take Command v11 Public Beta Build 27 Uploaded Support 10
rconn Take Command v11 Public Beta Build 25 Uploaded Support 6
rconn Take Command v11 Public Beta Build 24 Uploaded Support 10
rconn Take Command v11 Public Beta Build 23 Uploaded Support 2
rconn Take Command v11 Public Beta Build 22 Uploaded Support 23
rconn Take Command v11 Public Beta Available Support 3
rconn Take Command v11.0.31 uploaded Support 9
rconn Take Command v11 RC2 (build 29) Uploaded Support 1
rconn Take Command v11 RC1 (build 28) Uploaded Support 10
rconn News Take Command / TCC / CMDebug / TCC-RT v28 Released Support 0
T Take Command 28: Lua reports version 5.4.0 (5.4.3 expected) Support 0
Jay Sage WAD Possible Bug With OPTION Command With @FILE Support 5
rconn News Take Command / TCC / CMDebug / TCC-RT 27.01.24 uploaded Support 0
J Take command does not start on Windows 10 Support 3
vefatica `Back quotes` - command line vs. batch file Support 5
Jay Sage WAD Failure of Alias Command with /Z Option Support 14
Phileosophos Is there any way to open the Take Command options dialog from the command line? Support 7
Phileosophos Command-line Editing Shortkeys That Fail Support 6
fpefpe How to? free (internal) command Support 0
rconn News Take Command / TCC / CMDebug / TCC-RT 27.01.23 uploaded Support 0
T How to? retain command history across reboot? Support 6
rconn News Take Command / TCC / CMDebug / TCC-RT v27.01 Build 22 Uploaded Support 0
Jay Sage Bug With Flow Control and/or Command Grouping Support 2
GermanDirk How to? EVENTLOG Command with simple User Rights not functional Support 4
Jay Sage Take Command Is Too Fast! Support 4
Jay Sage Comparison of IF with Command Group and IFF Support 6
D Open Windows 10 Photos app from command line Support 11
rconn News Take Command / TCC / CMDebug / TCC-RT 27.0.21 uploaded Support 0
rconn News Take Command / TCC / CMDebug / TCC-RT 27.0.20 uploaded Support 0
U Can not get/start Take Command gui Support 1
rconn News Take Command / TCC / CMDebug / TCC-RT 27.0.19 Support 0
S Increasing Font Point Size in Command Tabs Support 2
mfarah Fixed The DATE command produces the wrong error message. Support 1
vefatica Command name mix-up Support 3
FreezerBurnt "Missing SETLOCAL" when initializing Visual Studio Command Prompt. Support 9
E How to? Closing desktop created by DESKTOP command Support 10
rconn News Take Command / TCC / CMDebug / TCC-RT v27.0.18 Support 0
K Take Command fox XP? Support 7
Joe Caverly Documentation Replace internal command with LIBRARY command Support 0
fpefpe How to? command echo in title line/bar Support 2
U Command help on file names Support 5
vefatica Command line DO with no closing parenthesis? Support 9
vefatica Command history search is off Support 7
H How to? How can I say "if the command separator is not ~ then setdos /C~" Support 8
N Command execution slows down in TCC Prompt after a while Support 6
R Long commands retrieved from command history have blank line when wrapped Support 20
jpeni Take Command Language Examples Support 1
rconn News Take Command / TCC / CMDebug / TCC-RT 26.02.41 Uploaded Support 0
fpefpe winfr command Support 4
Dmitry L. Kobyakov Fixed The SETARRAY /R command works incorrectly with cyrillic files Support 2

Similar threads