- Jun
- 39
- 0
Shouldn't there be a reverse @filearray? With multi-dimensional support.
BTW. Why is the @filearray only one-dimensional?
Arjan
BTW. Why is the @filearray only one-dimensional?
Arjan
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!Shouldn't there be a reverse @filearray? With multi-dimensional support.
BTW. Why is the @filearray only one-dimensional?
Arjan
>---Quote (Originally by Arjan Feddema)---
>Shouldn't there be a reverse @filearray? With multi-dimensional support.
>
>BTW. Why is the @filearray only one-dimensional?
>
>Arjan
>---End Quote---
>
>NITV. A reverse @filearray would only require 2 or 3 lines in a
>user-defined function. (Though I don't know why you'd use it.)
>
>@FILEARRAY is one-dimensional because there's no way to predetermine the
>file's format, and using the wrong format would terminally trash the
>array. (The beta testers requested this as well, though none of them
>could actually come up with either a format or a reason for it.)
>
>
>
>
>---Quote (Originally by Arjan Feddema)---
>Shouldn't there be a reverse @filearray? With multi-dimensional support.
>
>BTW. Why is the @filearray only one-dimensional?
>
>Arjan
>---End Quote---
>
>NITV. A reverse @filearray would only require 2 or 3 lines in a
>user-defined function. (Though I don't know why you'd use it.)
>
>@FILEARRAY is one-dimensional because there's no way to predetermine the
>file's format, and using the wrong format would terminally trash the
>array. (The beta testers requested this as well, though none of them
>could actually come up with either a format or a reason for it.)
>
>
>
>