Fw: Improved performance for _ready and @ready

  • This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn more.
#1
E. S. Fabian wrote:
| The features which detect whether or not a specific drive is ready,
| or build the list of drives which are ready, on my system require
| over 21s for a disconnected but mapped network drive. In contrast an
| empty DVD drive takes only 0.24s. I wonder if the next version could
| build the READY list when starting up, and use a drive monitor
| thread to keep the list up to date. @READY could then just scan the
| list for drive status. When SHRALIAS is used, the list could even be
| kept in one of its memory-mapped files, so that any new TCC
| instances would have instant access.
|
| I am emailing this post on 2010.01.06 @ 09.58 EST.

I emailed the above post to tc_suggestions@jpsoft.com. As of 21.43 EST of
the same day, almost 12 hours later, it has not been reflected to my mail
server. This has happened to most of my emails to the TC suggestion
subgroup. I am therefore forwarding it to .
--
Steve
 
C

CSGalloway@nc.rr.com

Guest
#3
Re: Test message

Any update on the timestamp issue on the new FTP site?
----- Original Message -----
From: Steve Fábián
To: CSGalloway@nc.rr.com
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 10:58 AM
Subject: RE: [Take Command and TCC-t-1654] Re: Test message


Steve Fbin wrote:
| ...
| Sending this by test reply email EST 2010.01.04 09.37.00

Email returned 09.45 - approx. 8 min delay.

BTW, all files on new FTP site have timestamps of 2010-01-02 10:52:00 (EST),
even files many years old. Is there not a way to upload files while
preserving their modification timestamps?
--
Steve
 

rconn

Administrator
Staff member
May 14, 2008
10,101
85
#4
I emailed the above post to tc_suggestions@jpsoft.com. As of 21.43 EST of the same day, almost 12 hours later, it has not been reflected to my mail server. This has happened to most of my emails to the TC suggestion
subgroup. I am therefore forwarding it to .
--
Steve
Since the email integration is not yet functional on the new server (as mentioned in several other posts), you're going to be waiting a long time ...
 
#5
JP Software Forums" <neil@jpsoft.com>; "rconn wrote:
| Since the email integration is not yet functional on the new server
| (as mentioned in several other posts), you're going to be waiting a
| long time ...

Obviously due to the lack of email integration, I had not seen any of those
posts stating email integration is not yet available. For my use that means
the forum is temporarily dead. I only browse in libraries and stores.
--
Steve
 
D

drrob1

Guest
#6
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

seconded

Steve F=E1bi=E1n wrote:

> JP Software Forums" <neil@jpsoft.com>; "rconn wrote:
> | Since the email integration is not yet functional on the new server
> | (as mentioned in several other posts), you're going to be waiting a
> | long time ...
>=20
> Obviously due to the lack of email integration, I had not seen any of those=20
> posts stating email integration is not yet available. For my use that means=20
> the forum is temporarily dead. I only browse in libraries and stores.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAktHJ4cACgkQVRqaVGo2lhyvrACg50JRybgjn+e752mzDUsDskAm
yzIAoLyhnp6Ko9Cu9CptIU6fpGLZ2Du0
=3DXKCS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----