Fw: Improved performance for _ready and @ready

[Steve Fabian]

E. S. Fabian wrote:
| The features which detect whether or not a specific drive is ready,
| or build the list of drives which are ready, on my system require
| over 21s for a disconnected but mapped network drive. In contrast an
| empty DVD drive takes only 0.24s. I wonder if the next version could
| build the READY list when starting up, and use a drive monitor
| thread to keep the list up to date. @READY could then just scan the
| list for drive status. When SHRALIAS is used, the list could even be
| kept in one of its memory-mapped files, so that any new TCC
| instances would have instant access.
|
| I am emailing this post on 2010.01.06 @ 09.58 EST.

I emailed the above post to [email protected]. As of 21.43 EST of
the same day, almost 12 hours later, it has not been reflected to my mail
server. This has happened to most of my emails to the TC suggestion
subgroup. I am therefore forwarding it to .
--
Steve

 

[dim]

Test message

On 2010-01-04 04:42, vefatica wrote:

> Email received. Here's an emailed reply.

Testing testing, 1, 2, 3... :)

 

[[email protected]]

Re: Test message

Any update on the timestamp issue on the new FTP site?
----- Original Message -----
From: Steve Fábián
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2010 10:58 AM
Subject: RE: [Take Command and TCC-t-1654] Re: Test message


Steve Fbin wrote:
| ...
| Sending this by test reply email EST 2010.01.04 09.37.00

Email returned 09.45 - approx. 8 min delay.

BTW, all files on new FTP site have timestamps of 2010-01-02 10:52:00 (EST),
even files many years old. Is there not a way to upload files while
preserving their modification timestamps?
--
Steve

 

[rconn]

I emailed the above post to [email protected]. As of 21.43 EST of the same day, almost 12 hours later, it has not been reflected to my mail server. This has happened to most of my emails to the TC suggestion
subgroup. I am therefore forwarding it to .
--
Steve

Since the email integration is not yet functional on the new server (as mentioned in several other posts), you're going to be waiting a long time ...

 

[Steve Fabian]

JP Software Forums" <[email protected]>; "rconn wrote:
| Since the email integration is not yet functional on the new server
| (as mentioned in several other posts), you're going to be waiting a
| long time ...

Obviously due to the lack of email integration, I had not seen any of those
posts stating email integration is not yet available. For my use that means
the forum is temporarily dead. I only browse in libraries and stores.
--
Steve

 

[drrob1]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

seconded

Steve F=E1bi=E1n wrote:

> JP Software Forums" <[email protected]>; "rconn wrote:
> | Since the email integration is not yet functional on the new server
> | (as mentioned in several other posts), you're going to be waiting a
> | long time ...
>=20
> Obviously due to the lack of email integration, I had not seen any of those=20
> posts stating email integration is not yet available. For my use that means=20
> the forum is temporarily dead. I only browse in libraries and stores.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAktHJ4cACgkQVRqaVGo2lhyvrACg50JRybgjn+e752mzDUsDskAm
yzIAoLyhnp6Ko9Cu9CptIU6fpGLZ2Du0
=3DXKCS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

 

[rconn]

Re: Test message

> Any update on the timestamp issue on the new FTP site?

No, there is not a way to upload files while preserving their modification
times.

Rex Conn
JP Software