By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!I took Roedy to mean when he RUNS the batch files.Have you checked that your current font actually includes the block graphics characters? Not all do.
Character encoding is between you, your text editor, and the CHCP command. If mojibake is an issue in your batch files, I suggest saving them as UTF-16.
This, or something similar, was reported three weeks ago. See the thread: https://jpsoft.com/forums/threads/display-text-same-as-in-cmd.7311/
In a nutshell, TYPE, ECHO, ... are not using the console output code page (typically 437). Rex has not commented on the issue.
That doesn't bring back compatibility with CMD (and a long history).Ack; I'd forgotten that one. (Saving batch files as UTF-16 is still a workaround, though.)
I quite agree. A workaround, not a fix.That doesn't bring back compatibility with CMD (and a long history).
CHCP 437
I don't think that helps. Here, 437 is the console output CP, and I can't see 437's upper half correctly. Compare TYPE in v16 and v19.Or else add
to your TCSTART.BTM file. That'd be another workaround.Code:CHCP 437
v:\> ver & chcp 437 & type 437.txt
TCC 16.03.55 Windows 7 [Version 6.1.7601]
Active code page: 437
íóúñѪº¿⌐¬½¼¡«»░▒▓│┤╡╢╖╕╣║╗╝╜╛┐└┴┬├─┼╞╟╚╔╩╦╠═╬╧╨╤╥╙╘╒╓╫╪┘┌█▄▌▐▀αßΓπΣσµτΦΘΩδ∞φε∩≡±≥≤⌠⌡÷≈°∙·√ⁿ²■
v:\> exit
v:\> ver & chcp 437 & type 437.txt
TCC 19.10.51 Windows 7 [Version 6.1.7601]
Active code page: 437
¡¢£¤¥¦§¨©ª«¬®¯°±²³´µ¶·¸¹º»¼½¾¿ÀÁÂÃÄÅÆÇÈÉÊËÌÍÎÏÐÑÒÓÔÕÖ×ØÙÚÛÜÝÞßàáâãäåæçèéêëìíîïðñòóôõö÷øùúûüýþÿ
Vince, what is, if you make your test above with the TERMINAL font (in TCC, NOT in TCMD)? Would be interesting to know (if you have the time for) ...
It's the same with Terminal (as with Andale Mono, Lucida, and Consolas). All my tests have been with stand-alone TCC. WinDbg reveals that v19 calls MultiByteToWideChar with first argument 3 (CP_THREAD_ACP) while v16 calls the same function with first argument 437 (probably from GetConsoleOutputCP).@vefatica
Vince, what is, if you make your test above with the TERMINAL font (in TCC, NOT in TCMD)? Would be interesting to know (if you have the time for) ...
v:\> ver & echo %_fontinfo & chcp 437 & type 437.txt
TCC 16.03.55 Windows 7 [Version 6.1.7601]
2 8 12 400 Terminal
Active code page: 437
íóúñѪº¿⌐¬½¼¡«»░▒▓│┤╡╢╖╕╣║╗╝╜╛┐└┴┬├─┼╞╟╚╔╩╦╠═╬╧╨╤╥╙╘╒╓╫╪┘┌█▄▌▐▀αßΓπΣσµτΦΘΩδ∞φε∩≡±≥≤⌠⌡÷≈°∙·√ⁿ²■
v:\> exit
v:\> ver & echo %_fontinfo & chcp 437 & type 437.txt
TCC 19.10.51 Windows 7 [Version 6.1.7601]
2 8 12 400 Terminal
Active code page: 437
¡¢£☼¥▌§"cª«¬-r_°±²3'µ¶·,1º»¼½_¿AAAAÄÅÆÇEÉEEIIIIDÑOOOOÖxOUUUÜY_ßàáâaäåæçèéêëìíîïdñòóôoö÷oùúûüy_ÿ
v:\>
No need to apologize - codepages are evil - not just related to TCC/TCMD. I had and have frequently problems too - but not so frequently that I could not forget the important things about it :-)Roedy and Vincent are both correct, and I was wrong. TCC is interpreting OEM text files according to the Windows code page, also miscalled the "ANSI code page", and not per the console code page as they ought.
I apologize for confusing the issue.