No doubt, but this one combined "impossible because Microsoft did everything they could to prevent it" with "impossible because there's no way to create the logic in the code". The former one I frequently work around; the latter is harder.So now you let mere impossibility stand in your way? You must be getting soft!
Not trying to hit or hurt anyone, and it's honestly not a feature that I feel any desperate thirst for. I just remember multiple occasions in the past when Rex explained why a proposed feature was impossible, and then casually included it in the next build.