By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!copy /a: /e /f /g /md /nr /s /u /v /w "ftp://vefatica.net/*" anon\
ftp://vefatica.net/bigboy.bin => V:\anon\bigboy.bin
I made the file bigger (200,000,000 bytes) so I could capture the status report.
View attachment 3597
Checking prospero.unm.edu...
and seeing evidence of file transfer. The whole prospero thing took 7:19 and it downloaded everything. The second time I ran it, the prospero thing took 6:13 and it downloaded nothing (expected). The third time was like the second (6:13 again). In all cases the BTM choked when it got to the 7Z stuff.ftp://prospero.unm.edu/tcmd/v8/version.txt ... up to date
That seems a bit odd. It suggests that it's taking a lot of time ignoringThe whole prospero thing took 7:19 and it downloaded everything. The second time I ran it, the prospero thing took 6:13 and it downloaded nothing (expected).
src/* *.exe
./S
. Judging by your exclusions, I don't think you're interested in the stuff in the subdirectories anyway./[! src/ tcmd/ tccle/ tccrt/ *.exe version.sav ]
and remove the /F
.Heck! Make a complete list, with file names, and copy them one at a time. I doubt it would take significantly longer if you used IFTP. I haven't tested, but in a perfect world, _? will be zero if the file was copied and non-zero otherwise. If that's so, you could have a status report for every file.I realize there is nothing wrong with TCMD but I would just like more status messages. Was thinking for each FTP site -
dir /a:d ftp:whatever > %tmp%\whatever.lst
then check each folder - with the what is currently the BTM does..... but seems to be an easier way to get more status messages?