32b Build 54 does not match MD5 in tcmd.aiu

May 20, 2009
293
5
57
ITALY
I do not know if my issue is related. I tried to update with the command option. It said that there was a new version, but then when I started the download it said wrong size. I downloaded by hand the complete file from the http site and there it worked.


Regards

Rodolfo Giovanninetti
 
May 20, 2008
11,424
99
Syracuse, NY, USA
I updated successfully with "OPTION /U" shortly after build 54 was announced. I think there was a little tweak to it after that.
 
May 20, 2008
3,515
4
Elkridge, MD, USA
I do not know if my issue is related. I tried to update with the command option. It said that there was a new version, but then when I started the download it said wrong size. I downloaded by hand the complete file from the http site and there it worked.i

Yes, I forgot to mention it - the size reported in tcmd.aiu is also wrong. I downloaded tcmd.exe twice, into separate directories, they matched, so I made the assumption the .aiu file is incorrect, and successfully installed. No issues using it so far...
 
May 20, 2008
3,515
4
Elkridge, MD, USA
BTW, though many are aware, I need to install TCMD in multiple systems, and have volume-measured internet service, so I normally avoid the multiple downloads of the same installer (which you would do by using the UPDATE on each system) by explicitly downloadiing them to my "installation server" system.
 
May 20, 2008
3,515
4
Elkridge, MD, USA
Charles:
I noticed that on your FTP site the MD5 for 32b TCMD.EXE is the same as the one I calculated from the HTTP download (see above), but as of an hour ago both the size and hash code in http://jpsoft.com/downloads/v15/tcmdupdate.aiu are still not matching the installer, unchanged from my OP above. Did you just recalculate for your version.txt?

BTW, I appreciate the availability of the alternate download site, but I no longer use it. I now have my own jpupdate.btm, which unconditionally downloads the current .aiu files, and compares them with the saved versions to determine whether or not my system is up to date. The files are so small that the download volume is only insignificantly more than FTP would use to make the same determination, and Rex standardized the HTTP file names, so I can now test even for future versions. Run time is a little more, but it's while I get my coffee...
 

Charles Dye

Super Moderator
Staff member
May 20, 2008
4,469
88
Albuquerque, NM
prospero.unm.edu
I noticed that on your FTP site the MD5 for 32b TCMD.EXE is the same as the one I calculated from the HTTP download (see above), but as of an hour ago both the size and hash code in http://jpsoft.com/downloads/v15/tcmdupdate.aiu are still not matching the installer, unchanged from my OP above. Did you just recalculate for your version.txt?

I don't look at the AIU file; the checksums and so on are calculated when the files are uploaded to the server. (That's why the dates don't relate to anything else.)
 
Similar threads
Thread starter Title Forum Replies Date
rconn News Take Command / TCC / CMDebug / TCC-RT v27.01 Build 22 Uploaded Support 0
rconn News Take Command / TCC / CMDebug / TCC-RT v26 Public Beta build 26.0.21 Support 0
rconn News Take Command / TCC / CMDebug / TCC-RT Public Beta Build 26.0.20 Support 0
Alpengreis How to? Where is a ChangeLog for v25 build 16 Support 4
rconn News Take Command / TCC / CMDebug / TCC-RT v25 Build 9 Support 0
rconn News Take Command / TCC / CMDebug / TCC-RT v25 Public Beta Build 8 Uploaded Support 9
Stefan Hassel Installation file TC 24.02 Build 47 is actually version 25.00.1 Support 10
C build 42 Support 1
R How to? Compare executables' version/build # including 123.456.789.01 Support 10
Peter Murschall IDE: RTL with non-English resources-problem is back in Build 28 Support 4
vefatica Another problem with build 22. Support 3
B Everything version in Take Command build 39? Support 3
vefatica WAD ANSI still misbehaves with build 35 Support 36
Y TCC on Win 1709 Build 17063.1000 Support 5
cxxl What's new in Build 51? Support 3
rconn News CMDebug Public Beta build 21.01.47 Support 0
samintz Build 38 Install issue Support 5
C Del /W999 2gbFile.ext / latest build / Win7 x64 / MSE / Everything Support 5
E Fixed View command broken in version 21.0 build 22 Support 9
vefatica Build 29, bad image Support 8
R Fixed set /r has stopped working in build 35 Support 4
vefatica Build 20 installer woes Support 14
rconn News Take Command V20 beta build 9 Support 0
C take command 19 not doing well under windows 10 build 14295 Support 3
Fross Build 46 Oddity Support 5
rconn News Take Command v19 public beta build 24 uploaded Support 0
rconn News Take Command v19 public beta build 23 Support 0
P Color directories in Win10 build 10586 console Support 11
vefatica Build 28 install Support 8
vefatica build 20 -> 22 Support 2
fishman@panix.com How do I get Build 20? Support 7
C What build is just released v18? Support 1
vefatica Build 14 install Support 3
vefatica Something is hosed in build 74 Support 10
rps Fixed Win "set /p" not working in V17 build 53 Support 3
vefatica Build 45 & 46 installer glitch Support 2
R Parser problems after build 44 Support 5
cgunhouse Jabber Command Line Option Being Transmitted -- Fixed with Build 42 Support 2
vefatica Both IFTP problems remain in build 50 Support 35
Dan Glynhampton TPIPE in Build 41 Support 4
C Build 34 install error Support 4
S Build 34 OK Support 5
S Documentation Webpage not showing latest V15 build Support 0
vefatica Build 55: ipworks9.dll missing Support 8
S Questions about new build announcements Support 0
B tpipe and MSVCR110.dll TCC x64 Build 44?? Support 19
Charles Dye Build 35 under XP Support 10
D ftps gives "Unable to build data connection" Support 5
vefatica Fixed Not fixed in build 55 Support 4
fishman@panix.com Option: Updates broken in Build 36 Support 3

Similar threads