tcmd.exe/tcc.exe appcrash on exit

[jalong]

VER: TCC 10.00.65 Windows Vista [Version 6.0.6001] x64 / 8 GB RAM


Hi! When I exit TC 10 I get the following Windows error messages. Also, the processes don't terminate. Any ideas?

1. TAKE COMMAND HAS STOPPED WORKING
> Restart the Program

Problem signature:
Problem Event Name: APPCRASH
Application Name: tcmd.exe
Application Version: 10.0.0.65
Application Timestamp: 49dab031
Fault Module Name: StackHash_592e
Fault Module Version: 0.0.0.0
Fault Module Timestamp: 00000000
Exception Code: c0000005
Exception Offset: 0312811d
OS Version: 6.0.6001.2.1.0.256.1
Locale ID: 1033
Additional Information 1: 592e
Additional Information 2: 8c817e9abcd1a872d5d0bfa9be456baa
Additional Information 3: e80c
Additional Information 4: 7c66d0b11af2f35cfb178beaa9a2742a

2. TCC HAS STOPPED WORKING
> Restart the Program

Problem signature:
Problem Event Name: APPCRASH
Application Name: TCC.EXE
Application Version: 10.0.0.65
Application Timestamp: 49dab05c
Fault Module Name: StackHash_0620
Fault Module Version: 0.0.0.0
Fault Module Timestamp: 00000000
Exception Code: c0000005
Exception Offset: 0339c046
OS Version: 6.0.6001.2.1.0.256.1
Locale ID: 1033
Additional Information 1: 0620
Additional Information 2: 66ff02e0377fa6bbee051e50e148e2e6
Additional Information 3: a739
Additional Information 4: 92f6ad2f11062783db26d888a5b80873

Regards,
John

 

[rconn]

jalong wrote:

> VER: TCC 10.00.65 Windows Vista [Version 6.0.6001]
>
> Hi! When I exit TC 10 I get the following Windows error messages. Also, the processes don't terminate. Any ideas?
>
> 1. TAKE COMMAND HAS STOPPED WORKING
> > Restart the Program
>
> Problem signature:
> Problem Event Name: APPCRASH
> Application Name: tcmd.exe
> Application Version: 10.0.0.65
> Application Timestamp: 49dab031
> Fault Module Name: StackHash_592e
> Fault Module Version: 0.0.0.0
> Fault Module Timestamp: 00000000
> Exception Code: c0000005
> Exception Offset: 0312811d
> OS Version: 6.0.6001.2.1.0.256.1
> Locale ID: 1033
> Additional Information 1: 592e
> Additional Information 2: 8c817e9abcd1a872d5d0bfa9be456baa
> Additional Information 3: e80c
> Additional Information 4: 7c66d0b11af2f35cfb178beaa9a2742a

"StackHash_xxx" doesn't have anything to do with TCMD or TCC. There are
a lot of Google matches for it, though at a quick glance nobody seems to
be sure where it comes from or how to fix it.

One thing to try is to check your DEP settings, and if they're enabled
for all apps try turning it off for TCMD / TCC.

Rex Conn
JP Software

 

[jalong]

Thanks for your reply.

The issue was AVG Free 8.5. AVG had been detecting tcmd.exe as a false positive. So I had added \jpsoft\tcmd10 to the exclusions but that obviously wasn't enough. TCMD worked fine once AVG was completely removed.

Now to find another AV program...

Regards,
John

 

[rconn]

jalong wrote:

> Thanks for your reply.
>
> The issue was AVG Free 8.5. AVG had been detecting tcmd.exe as a false positive. So I had added \jpsoft\tcmd10 to the exclusions but that obviously wasn't enough. TCMD worked fine once AVG was completely removed.
>
> Now to find another AV program...

I've had good luck with Avast and with Rising Antivirus.

Rex Conn
JP Software

 

[dim]

The issue was AVG Free 8.5. AVG had been detecting tcmd.exe as a false positive. So I had added \jpsoft\tcmd10 to the exclusions but that obviously wasn't enough. TCMD worked fine once AVG was completely removed.

Now to find another AV program...

This is a bit offtopic, but just consider one of the latest antivirus comparison tests here. There are several programs that detect more than 99% of the test samples (which is extremely high), such as Avira AntiVir and G-Data AntiVirus.

However, these programs do not get the highest "awards" in this test; they are just considered 'advanced', while a number of other scanners (e.g. NOD32, Symantec) get the rating 'advanced+'. The lower rating for the former programs is solely because of the many false positives.

It looks like the paid-for scanners (e.g. Symantec, NOD32, McAfee) have the least false positives.

In this report, you will also see that AVG gets the rather low 'standard' rating, which is because of:

• A low detection rate, just 93%
• Slow on-demand scanning speed
• And last but not least, 'many' false positives

In short, please avoid AVG. :)